Thursday, April 10, 2008
Final Reflections
In terms of things we would change, the instruction book was a little vague; especially when it came to what constituted a product modification. We ended up making a number of decisions based on incorrect information because we made incorrect inferences from the little information provided. As well, the R&D section lacked a lot of detail and left us with a bunch of unanswered questions. Things like base cost vs. minimum realistic cost were not explained at all and left us questioning which to use for our decisions. Some of the analysis tools we never figured out how to use (i.e. regression analysis). The book did not have any information on how to use them and so we ended up ignoring them for the most part.
In conclusion, the game as a whole was well worth the effort and we would recommend it to further classes
Thursday, April 3, 2008
Period 10
Thursday, March 27, 2008
Period 9
Probably the smartest decision we have made to date was dropping SOCK; strategically it freed up valuable resources to push our more entrenched and popular products. We managed to not only get rid of all the inventory of SOLD and SOBO but also sold much more of them this period (almost 100% growth in volume sold for both of the Sonites). As well, we gained a lot of market share in both the Sonite and Vodite markets this period. However, even with our large gains in market share Team E continues to dominate the industry and their success is being reflected in their skyrocketing stock price. Nonetheless, a lot of positives resulted from our previous decisions and it is nice to see our increased sales force is helping to generate enormous sales.
Team E has built a comfortable cushion for themselves but Company O will never give up!
Saturday, March 22, 2008
Period 8
This saturation situation was not a complete loss as it has offered us a valuable lesson: careful consideration must be given to competitor actions in order to determine what direction they are planning to move their product mix. Our main goal for this upcoming period will be to get rid of inventory and reinvigorate the sales of our Sonites. As was planned previously, we will reduce our total number of products down to four (drop SOCK this period) so that we can shift more of our advertising and sales force resources to our key products. Thanks to the generous support of the Bart Industry Government, we are again receiving a subsidy this period. We will spend the extra budget on expanding our sales force so as to keep ourselves on par with the industry competitors’ levels.
With increased R&D activities, advertising expenditure, and sales force resources, we believe we will be able to continue to improve our sales in this ever competitive environment.
Thursday, March 13, 2008
Period 7
Our decision to drop SONY was wise — at least we are not further incurring more inventory holding costs which will hinder the growth of our stock price. It is also good news to know that we sold out most of our products. Our main competitor now is Team E. We will need to find ways to compete head-on with their products; preferably before they get even richer! From the newsletter we found out that they dropped their SEHI (initially targeted at High-earners), and this means that we can now capture the entire High-earners market with our modified SONO the period after next. As for SEMI (which is targeted at Others), they are selling upwards of 378,000 units while our comparable product, SOLD, is only selling in the range of 96,000 units. We must modify SOLD with PSOAR this period so that we can “push” SEMI out of the Others market. At the same time, seeing this opportunity in the Others market, we will modify SOCK this period (based on PSOAR) so that we can saturate the Others market with our products.
The main highlight this period was the 413.7% growth in volume sold for VOTI. We are heading in the right direction and will further modify it with PVOOT to better target the explosively growing followers segment. The future of Company O is looking bright!
As an aside, Company O would like to thank the industry experts: they were generous in informing us that the change in perceptual objectives and price of a product will not be considered a modification to a product.
Thursday, March 6, 2008
Period 6
For the 3rd period in the row, we are incurring a loss on our SONY product. After looking at our brand results report, the decision has been made to drop SONY; it is still in the middle of nowhere on the perceptual map even after modifying it with huge advertising research efforts post-launch. Still, something seems array and we can’t place our finger on it? Since period 4 our management team has wondered if the change in price and perceptual objectives to SONY are considered a modification. The answer is unclear – we inquired with a few of our competitors and as expected, we got consistent replies of “we’re not sure.” It seems that we will not find out the answer until our scheduled meeting with the ‘markstrat experts’ next period.
In the Vodite market, VEXX undercut us in price despite their base cost and characteristics are a little better than our VOTI. We might have been too greedy on our margin, and we will have to get rid of the huge inventory left next period as inventory holding cost for Vodites are considerable. Seeing how Team A is progressively doing better with their Vodites (note: a 139% increase in volume sold), we realized that the Vodite market (especially the followers segment with expected growth of 3000% in next 5 years) has infinite potential for expansion. That is why we are ordering more Vodite research studies next period – we must get to know more about the market before we can excel in it.
Thursday, February 28, 2008
Period 5
If you have read the industry newsletter this period there are three new Vodites in the market (two from Team A and one from Team I). They are all very high-end products with base costs around $400 and pricing in the range of $1000. Last period we were forced to order less Vodite market research studies due to insufficient funds for R&D. We are no longer 100% confident that that our Vodites currently under R&D will appeal to the Vodites target markets given that they are comparatively less sophisticated than the Vodites being offered by Teams I and U.

It is frustrating that we sacrificed our opportunity to gain first-mover advantage in the Vodite market because we did not have a big enough budget this period. Regardless, we believe that being risk averse will help us bounce back from financial hardship as opposed to dig ourselves deeper into trouble. The plan with respect to launching VOTI is to get more information on the Vodite market rather than enter it with a “pure guessing” strategy.
We know we will be able to get back to the top. It is just a matter of time, and maybe luck (we definitely need some luck when we launch VOTI!).
Thursday, February 14, 2008
Period 4

Planning ahead, we are also developing two new R&D feasibility studies (PSOHO and PSOBE) this period hoping to modify SONY and SOBO upon R&D completion. These modifications would help us better target SONY and SOBO to the Singles market, which is showing drastic growth in the coming periods according to the market forecast we purchased.
So that’s a lot of R&D projects…and they are expensive! We will have to cut advertising costs next period in order to spare money for all of the R&D that is on the go. At this point we feel that R&D is a key strategic tool in terms of evolving stagnant products and realigning them with new, growing segments. We are also ordering less Vodites research studies this period. This is going to be a sacrifice of short run sales for long run profits. We believe it will be more valuable to the company’s overall success to go with this strategy. We know that this is going to be a hard time for our company but we are committed to long term success and not just short term gains.
Thursday, February 7, 2008
Period 3

Our modification of SOLD was very successful — it resulted in enormous growth in volume sold. According to plan, SOBO was a huge success in the Buffs market. Not only did it capture a huge market share in the Buffs segment, it also “bumped” SASS away from the Buffs. These positive results are great but we know we will have to continue to modify SOBO or it will end up like SASS this period.
As the industry progresses and all the teams are proving more profitable, their budgets are growing thus allowing them to spend more on R&D. Of note are teams A and I who are spending a substantial amount on R&D; it seems that they are launching highly specialized products next period. To ensure our competitiveness, we are also actively participating in R&D for both Sonites and Vodites. We are developing a new product with a new R&D project, PSONY. This new product (SONY) is expected to be launched next period to first capture the Buffs market (as the Buffs are interested in new technology), then to the Singles market in the long run (because the Singles market will be growing by over 135% in the next 5 periods according to the market forecast research study).

We are also investing in two new R&D feasibility studies on two Vodites:
1.) PVOLT – with the worst possible product specifications so as to minimize production cost; and
2.) PVOVO – a mid-level product.
Because no other teams have launched a Vodite this period we could not do any research on the market, we are totally “shooting in the dark,” trying to predict the preferences of the Innovators in the Vodites market.
Thursday, January 31, 2008
Period 2

We know that we will have to continue to strategize with the future in mind in order to succeed. We are ordering a feasibility study on our PSONY project which is going to be a brand new product targeted towards Singles in the long run. Next period, we will use the finished R&D project, PSOLI, to modify SOLD and better target it to the Others market. We are also altering the MDS dimensions of our current products to help better target them towards their respective target markets. In the long run, we are planning to enter the Vodite market to gain possible first-mover advantage; in anticipation of entering this new market we are ordering some Vodite market research studies.
Thursday, January 24, 2008
Period 1
Obviously, our goal next period is to capture more market share. We will adopt a price-penetration strategy – we will decrease the price for SOLD and SONO to $199 and $499 with the aim of undercutting all our competitors so as to capture market share in the early stage. We are also hiring more salespeople to assist in the expected growth in sales. Further, we are happy to see that the results for our feasibility study have been released: we are going to invest budget into our first R&D project, PSOLI, which will be used to modify SOLD in period 3.

This period’s decisions feel inline with our overall growth strategy. It certainly feels as though we are aligning our strategy to start heading in the right direction — up!...the stock index chart that is!
Thursday, January 17, 2008
Thursday, January 10, 2008
Welcome!
From our previous knowledge of the industry in the MarkStrat world, we are approaching this business venture with the following overall strategy:
- conservative production levels
- competitive sales force size (firing costs are extremely high)
- products targeted towards niche markets
- undercut fellow competitors with regards to price
- eventually enter into Vodite market
We can anticipate that throughout the next couple of years, our strategies will need to evolve in reaction to rising competition. Ultimately, our goal is to retain a high stock price and capture a majority of market share in both Sonite and Vodite markets. Have faith in us - we will not disappoint you.
Keep you posted,